Are homebuyers responsible for violations of planning obligations s.106 (including financial contributions) related to residential construction? Where agreements are obligations relating to highways, whether it is construction of the alleged highway or acceptance/inauguration of land as a new highway, sections 38 and 278 of the Highways Act of 1980 may apply. These sections govern how land can be accepted by the local highway authority as a public highway (s38) at a public expense (s38), or guarantee funds for work on the existing highway or allow the developer to procure such works himself. Such provisions are generally provided for under a separate agreement, but it is no foreign that the agreements in point 106 also serve as motorway agreements. It is often common for courts to consider situations where, despite the best efforts of the draft agreement, unforeseen events occur when the section 106 contract is reviewed, making it difficult to interpret the agreement. This summer, the courts have provided some useful guidance on how they should be interpreted when the parties are confronted with the unexpected. What can you do if it doesn`t work as expected with respect to the s.106 agreements? Gary Soloman explained. Legal audits of the date of use of a s106 agreement are set out in Regulations 122 and 123 of the 2010 EU Infrastructure Tax Regulation, as amended. In general, the courts are prepared to apply the provisions of Section 106. As noted above, planning obligations are linked by rights holders, i.e.
future buyers from a part of the country subject to obligations, since they are considered to be exploited with the land. This means that a planning obligation may be imposed both against the confederation of origin (usually the owner of the construction zone) and against anyone who later acquires an interest in the land. Even if a subsequent purchaser of a single home did not participate in the Section 106 agreement, which is subject to the agreement of Section 106, for example if the developer is not financially sound or cannot be found, the APA could take coercive action against the purchaser as a legal successor. In addition, as a result of the Ministerial Statement on Start-Up Homes, the guideline states that LPAs should not seek contributions to affordable housing development for affordable housing (but may still target s106, which will mitigate the impact on development). If, for whatever reason, a proponent does not meet its obligations under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) (called planning obligation/section 106), the local planning authority (APA) may take steps to enforce the obligations of Section 106 (TCPA 1990), as outlined in the convention.